Jan 13 2018

Haiti = Craphole


Jan 8 2018

Racist, Nutty Oprah Winfrey for President? Hell No!

The Washington Examiner story by Gregory Kane:

Oprah said this when asked if the problem of racism in America had been solved:

“Of course the problem [of racism] is not solved. … As long as there are people who still— there’s a whole generation — I say this, you know, I said this, you know, for apartheid, South Africa, I said this for my own, you know, for my own community in the South — there are still generations of people, older people, who were born and bred and marinated in it, in that prejudice and racism, and they just have to die.”

In one quick, thoughtless breath, Oprah added another tenet to Libthink: Not only are all racists white, but they also need to “just die,” every last one of them. Once all those old, white racists “who were born and bred and marinated in it” have died, then America will be forever purged of racism. Make that “white racism,” and remember, according to Libthink doctrine, that’s the only racism worth mentioning.  The racism that blacks might hold for non-blacks, that Latinos might hold for non-Latinos and that Asians might hold for non-Asians won’t go away of course, no matter how much adherents of Libthink doctrine might wish it were so.  There will continue to be the attacks that black thugs make against white victims, some of which (if not all) have to be at least partially motivated by race.  That black vs. Latino racist conflict won’t end after all those old white folks “bred and marinated in racism” die.  Said conflict has been going on for years. You might have seen an episode about it on Oprah’s show when it was on the air.  What’s that? You never heard about what happened to Cheryl Green on Oprah’s show? Continue reading


Dec 29 2017

Christmas Funnies


Dec 21 2017

Another Dirty Libtard Caught


Nov 1 2017

DOJ threatens to pull California’s funding over “sanctuary state” law

The Department of Justice issued California another stern warning Wednesday – drop its sanctuary state status or remain in violation of federal law and potentially lose out on millions of dollars.

Earlier this month, Gov. Jerry Brown signed a so-called “sanctuary state” bill which basically erects a wall between California law enforcement and federal immigration enforcement officers. The bill forbids California cops from providing release and other information that isn’t publicly available in response to a request for notification from federal law enforcement.

The government has been pushing for notification from local authorities about when they have an undocumented immigrant in custody who has committed a crime, saying to withhold that information, and then release that person onto the streets is putting local communities in danger.

Supporters argue that sanctuary policies allow local and state law enforcement officers to build crucial relationships with immigrant communities. Critics say not turning over people living in the country illegally puts the public in danger. Wednesday’s letter urges California to comply federal statute (8 USC 1373) which bars local jurisdictions from limiting communication with federal law enforcement about a person’s immigration status or whereabouts. The letter states that California’s new law (SB54) “May violate,” 1373.

Department of Justice Officials tell Fox News this situation could result with future federal grants being withheld from California, that threat has been a common thread in this ongoing story. However DOJ officials also tell Fox they could “clawback” funds already awarded to the Golden State.

For instance California received more than $18 million in federal grants from the Department of Justice in 2016, funds DOJ officials say could be subject to a “clawback.”

“In early October, the State of California codified into law a requirement that local police release criminal aliens back onto our streets. This law undermines public safety and national security, was opposed by law enforcement, and potentially violates federal law,” said DOJ spokesman Devin O’Malley. “The abandonment of the rule of law evades all common sense, especially given the multiple high-profile incidents that have occurred in California as a result of similar policies. The Justice Department urges California to reconsider these so-called ‘sanctuary policies.’”

Gibson, Fox News


Nov 1 2017

Do Veterans Receive Hiring Preference for SES Positions?

The short answer, according to OPM, is “No. The reason is that 5 USC 2108(3) which defines the term “preference eligible” provides that this term does not include applicants for, or members of, the Senior Executive Service.”

There is a problem with this and it doesn’t appear to have been addressed by anyone.  The 5 USC 2108 was last revised in 1952, approximately 20 years before the Senior Executive Service (SES) was carved out of the GS pay scale system (it used to go to GS16, GS17, etc.).  In other words, it was meant to apply to the entire pay scale.  By separating the top end of the pay scale out and giving it a new name, the government has effectively rendered veterans preference null and void. This should be challenged by someone to bring the spotlight on it.