{"id":698,"date":"2010-11-01T10:45:05","date_gmt":"2010-11-01T15:45:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.patrioticfederalist.com\/Wordpress\/?p=698"},"modified":"2010-11-01T10:45:05","modified_gmt":"2010-11-01T15:45:05","slug":"november-brief-from-the-patriot-post","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/patrioticfederalist.com\/wp\/?p=698","title":{"rendered":"November Brief from the Patriot Post"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/patriotpost.us\/edition\/2010\/11\/01\/brief\/\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter\" title=\"VoteConservative\" src=\"http:\/\/image.patriotpost.us.s3.amazonaws.com\/2010-11-01-brief.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"189\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h2>The Foundation<\/h2>\n<p>&#8220;[I]f the citizens neglect their duty and place unprincipled men in  office, the government will soon be corrupted.&#8221; &#8211;Noah Webster<\/p>\n<h2>Liberty<\/h2>\n<p>&#8220;Most people whom we elect to Congress are either ignorant of, have  contempt for or are just plain stupid about the United States  Constitution. &#8230; Here, in part, is the oath of office that each  congressman takes: &#8216;I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support  and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies,  foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the  same&#8230;.&#8217; Here&#8217;s my question to you: If one takes an oath to uphold and  defend, and bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution, at the  minimum, shouldn&#8217;t he know what he&#8217;s supposed to uphold, defend and be  faithful to? If congressmen, judges, the president and other government  officials were merely ignorant of our Constitution, there&#8217;d be hope &#8212;  ignorance is curable through education. These people in Washington see  themselves as our betters and rulers. They have contempt for the limits  our Constitution places on the federal government envisioned by James  Madison, the father of our Constitution, who explained in the Federalist  Paper 45: &#8216;The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the  federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the  State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be  exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation,  and foreign commerce. &#8230; The powers reserved to the several States will  extend to all the objects which in the ordinary course of affairs,  concern the lives and liberties, and properties of the people, and the  internal order, improvement and prosperity of the State.'&#8221; &#8211;economist <a href=\"http:\/\/patriotpost.us\/opinion\/walter-e-williams\/2010\/10\/27\/our-contemptible-congress\/\">Walter E. Williams<\/a><\/p>\n<h2>Government<\/h2>\n<p>&#8220;The progressive assault on America continues, and their favorite  whipping boy remains Arizona. A three-judge panel from the Ninth Circuit  Court of Appeals has overturned that state&#8217;s requirement that people  show proof of citizenship to register to vote, calling it &#8216;inconsistent&#8217;  with the National Voter Registration Act. In other words, a United  States court considers that proving one is an American citizen in order  to vote in an American election an &#8216;undue burden.&#8217; How in the world did  we come to this? &#8230; What&#8217;s the best way to destroy our democratic  republic? Getting enough Americans to question the integrity of our  election process has to be high on the list. And since every case ever  litigated in this country with regard to voter ID has had Democrats  lined up on the side where less proof is required for voting &#8212; using  the phony &#8216;disenfranchisement&#8217; argument as an excuse &#8212; an unmistakable  pattern is emerging. A pattern which can be reduced to one simple idea:  The acquisition and\/or maintenance of power by any means necessary. &#8230;  Maintaining the integrity of our election process far outweighs any  individual undue burdens, and the overwhelming majority of Americans  know it. Those who are determined to fight such commonsense provisions  aren&#8217;t fooling anyone, except perhaps their fellow travelers. There is  absolutely no <em>reasonable argument<\/em> to offer against making sure that Americans, and only Americans, vote in American elections &#8212; <em>none<\/em>.  One more compelling reason for decent Americans to get out and vote &#8230;  Tuesday. Maybe the most important one of all.&#8221; &#8211;columnist <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jewishworldreview.com\/1010\/ahlert.php3\">Arnold Ahlert<\/a><\/p>\n<h2>Re: The Left<\/h2>\n<p>&#8220;Denial isn&#8217;t just a river in Egypt. It&#8217;s the Democrats&#8217; coping  mechanism for midterm election voter fraud. Faced with multiple reports  of early voting irregularities and election shenanigans across the  country, left-wing groups are playing dumb, deaf and blind. Voter fraud?  What voter fraud? More cunningly, these organizations are seeking to  marginalize complaints about election integrity by casting citizen  watchdog efforts as racist &#8216;scare tactics.&#8217; Echoing President Obama&#8217;s  message to the Democratic faithful on the campaign trail, they are  accusing political opponents of suppressing the votes of minorities and  the poor. On Tuesday, The New York Times quoted a liberal voting rights  advocate, Wendy R. Weiser, wringing her hands over individual Americans  taking clean elections seriously: &#8216;Private efforts to police the polls  create a real risk of vote suppression, regardless of their intent,&#8217;  said Weiser, director of the Voting Rights and Elections Project at the  Brennan Center for Justice at New York University. &#8216;People need to know  that any form of discrimination, intimidation or challenge to voters  without adequate basis is illegal or improper.&#8217; &#8230; Funny. For the past  two years, Democratic leaders have had nothing to say about the militant  New Black Panther Party goons who took it upon themselves to police a  Philadelphia voting booth in 2008 wielding billy clubs and shouting  anti-white slurs to suppress votes. Now, they&#8217;re treating citizen  election monitors as if they are the jack-booted thugs. &#8230; Silence  dissent. Criminalize watchdogs. Whitewash fraud. Discourage grassroots  engagement. Deny, deny, deny. These are the signature tactics of the  left in the age of Obama. On November 2, Americans get their chance to  say: Enough.&#8221; &#8211;columnist <a href=\"http:\/\/patriotpost.us\/opinion\/michelle-malkin\/2010\/10\/27\/the-lefts-voter-fraud-whitewash\/\">Michelle Malkin<\/a><\/p>\n<h2>Political Futures<\/h2>\n<p>&#8220;Based on the sheer volume of usage, President Obama&#8217;s teleprompter  must love the phrase &#8216;our American values.&#8217; The phrase comes in a close  third after &#8216;Let me be clear&#8217; and &#8216;I will call you out on that.&#8217; Since  he uses the phrase so often, we should try to understand what he is  saying. &#8230; The untethered progressive values of hope, change,  tolerance, peace, unity, etc. come to mind. Presumably, the &#8216;ideals&#8217; and  &#8216;values&#8217; of the left somehow have the power to bind together a country  of citizens. &#8230; When Obama touts &#8216;our American values,&#8217; odds are that  he is advancing their very opposites. When our American values call for  self-preservation, Obama calls for terrorists&#8217; rights. When our American  values call for traditional morality, Obama appoints someone like Kevin  Jennings as &#8216;safe school czar&#8217; for children. When our American values  call for border enforcement, Obama sees millions of potential Democrat  voters. And so on. The ironies of the Obama administration are like a  series of never-ending waves crashing upon us. &#8230; The sad reality is  that a man was somehow elected who is effectively a foreigner to our  real American values. Our quintessential American value, liberty, means  being free from central control. Of course, that&#8217;s the very antithesis  to the ideology of the man occupying the White House.&#8221; &#8211;columnist <a href=\"http:\/\/www.americanthinker.com\/2010\/10\/president_obama_and_our_core_a.html\">Monte Kuligowski<\/a><\/p>\n<h2>For the Record<\/h2>\n<p>&#8220;Tuesday, Nov. 2, 2010 is not Election Day. It is Referendum Day. It  may be commonplace for commentators to announce that every election is  &#8216;the most important election in our lifetime&#8217; or something analogous.  But having never said that of a presidential election, let alone an  off-year election, this commentator cannot be accused of crying wolf  when I say that this off-year election is not simply the most important  of my lifetime. It is the most important since the Civil War. The reason  is that unlike all previous elections, this one is actually a  referendum on the direction of the United States of America. &#8230; And  what would constitute a Democrat victory next Tuesday? Anything other  than a Republican landslide. Any other result will be interpreted by the  media and by the Democrats as solely a result of the economic recession  and as the normal losses of the dominant party in off-year elections.  In other words, the only way to ensure that the electoral results are  seen as a repudiation of the growth of the state and the other Democrat  and leftist goals is through an enormous Republican victory. Only then  will America understand that this election was not first about jobs. It  was above all about America.&#8221; &#8211;radio talk-show host <a href=\"http:\/\/patriotpost.us\/opinion\/dennis-prager\/2010\/10\/26\/this-is-a-referendum-not-an-election\/\">Dennis Prager<\/a><\/p>\n<h2>Culture<\/h2>\n<p>&#8220;The fate of [NPR&#8217;s Juan] Williams reminds us that Americans have  developed two personas &#8212; one public and politically correct, the other  private. Mix the two and big trouble ensues. Here are some reminders  about what to shut up about. Don&#8217;t discuss the deficit. Instead, call  borrowing &#8216;stimulus.&#8217; Trillions are not much different from billions.  Debt can be paid back with more borrowing and someone else&#8217;s higher  taxes. Ignore the lessons of Greece and California. To appear noble,  call for more unemployment benefits, free medical care and more  entitlements. To sound cruel, talk about borrowing to pay for them. Keep  silent about Social Security and Medicare. If the system is insolvent,  it cannot be because we are living longer, retiring earlier, often  taking out more than we paid into the pot, abusing disability  provisions, or facing an aging and soon-to-be-shrinking population.  Instead, rail at fat cats who need to pay more payroll taxes, and at  wasteful programs like defense that can be cut to ensure more for the  elderly and needy. The checks will always come in time, and &#8216;they&#8217; will  always pay for them. &#8230; The NAACP has accused the Tea Party of racist  views. The anger over high taxes, debt and big government warrants more  concern among the Beltway&#8217;s black leadership than exploring the causes  of inordinately high incidence of crime, incarceration and one-parent  homes, and low high school graduation rates. Whatever one&#8217;s private  views, groupspeak requires that answers are found outside, not inside,  the black community &#8212; and demand more programs and more federal money.  &#8230; We do not quite know how Americans will vote [this] week, in part  because citizens fear to talk openly about their concerns and instead  employ groupspeak. We suspect that in the privacy of the voting booth,  they may prove angrier and more frustrated than we think.&#8221; &#8211;historian <a href=\"http:\/\/patriotpost.us\/opinion\/victor-davis-hanson\/2010\/10\/28\/american-groupspeak\/\">Victor Davis Hanson<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Foundation &#8220;[I]f the citizens neglect their duty and place unprincipled men in office, the government will soon be corrupted.&#8221; &#8211;Noah Webster Liberty &#8220;Most people whom we elect to Congress are either ignorant of, have contempt for or are just plain stupid about the United States Constitution. &#8230; Here, in part, is the oath of &#8230; <a title=\"November Brief from the Patriot Post\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"http:\/\/patrioticfederalist.com\/wp\/?p=698\" aria-label=\"Read more about November Brief from the Patriot Post\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,10],"tags":[229],"class_list":["post-698","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-patriotic","category-politics","tag-patriot-post"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/patrioticfederalist.com\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/698","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/patrioticfederalist.com\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/patrioticfederalist.com\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/patrioticfederalist.com\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/patrioticfederalist.com\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=698"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/patrioticfederalist.com\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/698\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":700,"href":"http:\/\/patrioticfederalist.com\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/698\/revisions\/700"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/patrioticfederalist.com\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=698"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/patrioticfederalist.com\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=698"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/patrioticfederalist.com\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=698"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}